News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.
Local Business Search
Stock Summary
Dow17090.5510.98
Nasdaq4561.413.71
S&P 5001996.970.23
AEP53.440.12
Comcast54.570.05
GE26.020.01
ITT Exelis17.240.07
LNC54.930.27
Navistar37.75-0.08
Raytheon96.600.56
SDI23.180.04
Verizon49.550.14
FARM FILE, A COLUMN BY ALAN GUEBERT

Buck stops with us (it sure won’t with Congress)

Saturday, March 23, 2013 - 12:01 am

Congress continues to wrangle over deep budget sequestration cuts no one really wanted, hammers away at a continuing resolution to fund the government through Sept. 30, and begins yet another round of poisonous, finger-wagging 2014 budget talks.

More amazing than this heavy workload is the amazingly light work calendar Congress keeps. Come March 31, 90 days into 2013, the House will have spent a backbreaking 35 days in their legislative sweatshop; the Senate almost half-again as many, 50.

Recent research “found that more than one-sixth of (a Congressional member's) day was devoted to political or campaign work, including fundraising,” reports Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper.

Moreover, continues Roll Call, “Combined with the hours devoted to media relations, the numbers grew to 26 percent of time spent on self-promotion when in Washington and 32 percent allocated that way in their districts.”

So, if “self-promotion” consumed one in four of those in-D.C. “work” days, House members actually worked just 26 days so far this year on the people's business; the Senate, 38. The rest of the time our elected officials were either dealing with personal campaign issues or trolling for campaign contributions.

The newspaper hung some hard numbers on this perpetual political pursuit:

“(T)he average House member raised $1.6 million for the most recent campaign – or $2,200 every 24 hours from Election Day 2010 until Election Day 2012. For the 25 senators who sought re-election, the figures are even more staggering… an 'in cycle' pace approaching $16,000 a day.”

All this campaign money – collectively, 2012 Congressional races cost $3.7 billion; in 2000, those same races cost $1.7 billion – hasn't bought happiness. It has, however, bought a lot of public debt.

From the 2000 election through the 2012 election, the U.S. federal deficit, in round numbers, climbed from $5.8 trillion to $14.3 trillion.

About $6.1 trillion of it was added by Congress during the Bush Administration's eight years; nearly $3 trillion was added in the Obama Administration's first three budget years. (Another trillion arrives this year.)

That means, of course, that everyone on opposite ends of Pennsylvania Avenue for the past 12 years own some piece of today's federal budget mess.

More directly, so do you and I. We are the ones who elected these political stars and stiffs; they are our “representatives.” That makes us the actual people where the buck stops, behind yesterday's debt and today's budget debacle. It's us out here, not them out there.

What now?

Should we cut a 75-year-old's Social Security check to upgrade an 85-year-old river lock? Should we slice my crop insurance subsidy to maintain your Medicare benefit?

Should we move forward together or apart as winners and losers?

Alan Guebert’s Farm File appears File appears Saturdays. Contact him at agcomm@farmandfoodfile.com or Alan Guebert, 21673 Lago Drive, Delavan, IL 61734. His website is www.farmandfoodfile.com.