• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Friday, September 22, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

Long shot for return to proper balance of power

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Friday, March 01, 2013 12:01 am
Once again we witness a “conservative” proposing a bold new idea and members of the “progressive left” fiercely resisting the threat to the status quo.The dangerous radical is Indiana Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, whose resolution calling for a national constitutional convention passed the Senate 32-18. If the Indiana House and 33 other state legislatures approve it, a convention would be called to define limits on the commerce and taxing powers of Congress.

But we’ve never done that before! Who knows what could happen? “The idea of a runaway convention is real,” warns Senate Democratic leader Tim Lanane, D- Anderson. A liberal editorial page adds this: “Rewriting the Constitution because someone does not like a particular law, a particular court decision or the outcome of an election is a dangerous step and an even more dangerous precedent.”

It would indeed be reactionary to “rewrite the Constitution” just because somebody got bent out of shape over a particular election or court decision. But that vastly oversimplifies what Long and his allies are upset about.

The imbalance they seek to correct did not come with one specific event. It’s been gradually happening over the whole course of the country’s existence under constitutional rule. The original balance of power between states and the federal government envisioned under federalism has disappeared as Congress gave itself more authority and took more of it away from states. The convention would seek a return to the proper balance by proposing amendments to further limit the ability of Congress to regulate commerce among the states using the Commerce Clause and to tax under the powers of the 13th Amendment.

States’ rights, Long says, might disappear altogether. This is a way to keep it from happening “with a process that is legal, that is constitutional and that, if done correctly, will be effective.”

But couldn’t convention members, once assembled, do anything they wanted to no matter how the resolution limited them? Certainly they could come up with some silly changes, perhaps even dangerous ones. But anything coming out of the convention would have to be approved by a majority of voters of 38 states. Are we to trust Americans with everything about their republic except what’s in its guiding document?

This is more of a long shot than a dangerous idea. The biggest risk is that it will be a waste of time. But nothing else has come close to taming the federal behemoth, so heaven knows it’s worth the effort. At least we’ll keep talking about the issue.


News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus