• Newsletters
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Thursday, September 21, 2017
View complete forecast
News-Sentinel.com Your Town. Your Voice.

Marketing minds cream the co-op

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.The Associated Press
Saturday, November 03, 2012 12:01 am
Sometimes it takes a newspaper's ink-stained thumb to right the scale of justice.On Sunday, The New York Times published a 2,900-word tribute to the greedy good-old-boyism that seems to have been the business plan of America's biggest dairy cooperative, Dairy Farmers of America, upon its creation in 1998.

According to Times business writer Andrew Martin, court documents in two antitrust suits by dairy farmers against their own co-op, DFA, and its biggest milk customer, Dean Foods, allege a decade of cronyism and insider dealing that left the co-op owners in dust.

The DFA-Dean saga began when four regional milk marketing cooperatives merged to form DFA in 1998. Gary Hanman, boss of one of the four, took command. The new co-op claimed to represent nearly 30 percent of all fluid milk in America.

That big bucket caught the attention of Gregg Engles who was building Dean Foods into a dairy powerhouse.

The deal Engles and Hanman cut, writes Martin, “went against normal economics.”

Engles promised Hanman that DFA “would be the exclusive supplier to Deans' milk plants” and DFA, “in turn, promised a reliable supply of … raw milk, at the lowest prices, plus rebates and credit so Dean could acquire more milk plants, the suit says.”

Hanman's job was to build member profit by selling DFA milk to processors, not secure processor equity, as the suits allege, by selling DFA milk cheap.

Court documents in the civil suits (one is referred to as “Southeast,” the other “Northeast”) draw a deeply tangled web of business deals, buyouts and payouts by Dean, DFA and numerous other dairy entities. The resulting picture, allege the plaintiff-farmers, is a Dean-DFA deal that milked cooperative members to enrich dairy executives. Neither suit has gone to trial, so that key allegation remains unaddressed. What is more certain, according to the Times, is the cash pocketed.

“One business partner of Mr. Hanman was paid $100 million by Deans' predecessor and the DFA for his stake in milk plants, the partner had paid $6.9 million for it two years earlier. A business partner of Mr. Engles was paid more than $80 million for his investment in milk plants; that partner had paid little more than $5 million.

“Mr. Hanman was paid $31.6 million during his seven-year tenure as chief executive … As for Mr. Engles, his compensation over the last decade comes to $156 million …”

Dairy observers, though, reckon one-third of the dairy operations in states covered in the two lawsuits went out of business during the same period.

Dean Foods remains. In July it bought its way out of the Southeast suit for $140 million. A year earlier it settled the Northeast lawsuit for $30 million.

DFA, however, is hanging tough against its own members; the Southeast suit goes to trial in January. If DFA loses at trial, estimated penalties could top $1.2 billion under current antitrust laws.

That tab, too, will fall on DFA's members.

Hanman retired in 2006, and Engles, the Times reports, will relinquish Dean's top spot by the end of 2012, one year after “Forbes ranked him among it Worst Bosses for the Buck” in 2011.


News-Sentinel.com reserves the right to remove any content appearing on its website. Our policy will be to remove postings that constitute profanity, obscenity, libel, spam, invasion of privacy, impersonation of another, or attacks on racial, ethnic or other groups. For more information, see our user rules page.
comments powered by Disqus